Is America Burning - a Forum To Discuss Issues

All comments welcome, pro or con. Passionate ok, but let's be civil. ...Pertinent comments will be published on this blog. Air your viewpoints.

Photobucket

Skyline - Houston, Texas

Saturday, July 01, 2006

Look What They're Doing Now.

From Democratic Underground today.

Ron Paul of Texas will introduce a resolution in the House which will prohibit the federal courts from overturn state laws.

It's an attack on gay and women's rights of course but it could also be used to overturn Brown vs Board of Education and many other cases where the Federal courts have stepped in.

Here's an excerpt from the article:

In the wake of the Senate’s failure to approve a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage, conservatives are now coalescing around what amounts to their runner-up option. Various conservative and evangelical Christian organizations are now championing the “We the People Act.” The act would prohibit the Supreme Court and all other federal courts from ruling on the constitutionality of state laws, especially those concerning sexual orientation. If passed by Congress, this act would severely limit some of the most basic legal principles of the Constitution.

The act was introduced in the House of Representatives in November of last year. But it remained dormant while conservatives waited to see how the amendment banning gay marriage played out. With its rejection last month, the act’s principal sponsor in the House, Republican Congressman Ron Paul of Texas, has now resurrected House bill 4379, known as the We the People Act. According to Representative Paul, the act is needed because, “The only way to resolve controversial social issues like abortion and school prayer is to restore respect for state and local governments to adopt policies that reflect the beliefs of the citizens of those jurisdictions.”


Keep an eye on this one. It may be our next domestic battleground.

Labels:

8 Comments:

  • At Sunday, July 02, 2006 1:30:00 AM , Blogger David Cho said...

    Where was Ron Paul when a bunch of states passed propositions to legalize marijuana?

     
  • At Sunday, July 02, 2006 5:27:00 AM , Blogger lindsaylobe said...

    As an ironical twist in Australia we have the reverse!!
    The ACT(Canberra )introduced a bill into their parliamentary jurisdiction, which recognises gay marriages, but the enacted law was overturned by the Commonwealth Govt, which has power over these aspects, that is what is defined as marriage.

    Best wishes

     
  • At Sunday, July 02, 2006 6:18:00 AM , Blogger Unknown said...

    David; Ron Paul is a medical doctor and probably disapproves of the uncontrolled use of the herb, which DOES have harmful side effects when used in the manner of many pot heads. It has medicinal uses but is all too often abused, as are many medicines.

    Re: the article by Granny. That is a thorny subject. Since the Federal government is encroaching upon and usurping too many States Rights, there must be a line drawn in the sand, and States need to fight back to retain their autonomy. We do not need another Civil War, nor do we need the Feds to completely take over. To knuckle under to Federal domination just to preserve issues that MIGHT be abolished or prevented would be foolish. Not ALL states will automatically pass laws against abortion, gay rights, etc..; there are many other important factors to consider also.

    I do not know Ron Paul's personal feeling on abortion and gay rights, but I do know he is one of the rare creatures on the Hill that actually listens to his constituents and tried to do what he is elected to do -- represent the will of the people. Thanks to some plain and fancy gerrymandering a number of years ago, Ron Paul's district now encompasses a number of small towns and rural areas, so the people he represents tend to be quite conservative. He is a good man.

     
  • At Sunday, July 02, 2006 1:52:00 PM , Blogger David Cho said...

    Now I remember Ron Paul.

    Didn't he run on the Libertarian ticket for President in 1988? Yes, I think he did.

    Also, he asked some serious questions about the war in Iraq.

     
  • At Sunday, July 02, 2006 1:54:00 PM , Blogger Ingrid said...

    There is a whole slew of ways in which the checks and balances can become off balance. What is most off balance though is the relative few who are politically active and alert, vs those who think all is well because they don't have to get their butts of the couch..
    Ingrid

     
  • At Sunday, July 02, 2006 7:56:00 PM , Blogger Unknown said...

    David: thank you for posting the link to Ron Paul's questions re: the war with Iraq.

    The header to the war blog http:// this-is-war.blogspot.com is Ron Paul's statement about the war, to which I agree 100%.

    It is a tragic shame that so few Congressmen/women failed to have the honor, decency, guts, patriotism, and responsibility to the nation and the public to follow Paul's example, instead of caving in or eagerly backing BushCo. Every one of those need to be impeached and imprisoned. Or executed for treason.

     
  • At Sunday, July 02, 2006 10:33:00 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

    I can not believe my eyes! The ability of the Federal Government to overide State law is a fundemental aspect of the way our legal system works. I plan on looking into it and posting on my site about it.

     
  • At Monday, July 03, 2006 8:39:00 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

    This is not what will happen, and ultimately this is not what the GOP wants. So it's chance of passing is virtually nil.

    Republican's are just as much in favor of using Federal power to override state's laws as Democrats. Witness Bu$hCo's repeatedly suing California and the Northeastern corridor over clean air standards that make it very tough the GOP paymasters.

    If the GOP lets this pass this country will devolve into two Americas, one where the GOP has no, and I repeat *NO*, influence. They'll never let this happen.

     

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home