Is America Burning - a Forum To Discuss Issues

All comments welcome, pro or con. Passionate ok, but let's be civil. ...Pertinent comments will be published on this blog. Air your viewpoints.

Photobucket

Skyline - Houston, Texas

Wednesday, August 23, 2006

ARE YOU SAFE YET?

I thought you might be interested in this from Jim Hightower's Lowdown Newsletter! It's a long poster but contains very revealing facts.

POSTER: Are you safe yet?

Saturday, August 5, 2006
Posted by Jim Hightower

Note: this is a text version of a full-sized poster that is available for download as a PDF.

To request hard copies of the poster, please contact Laura at Hightower's office, via our contact form (select "Copies of poster" from the drop-down menu).


Are you safe yet?
The war president
  • Number of Americans killed in Bush's Iraq war as of August 2006: 2577
  • What Bush press flack Tony Snow said the day the total number of American dead reached 2,500: "It's a number"
  • Number of Americans killed since Bush declared "Mission Accomplished" on May 1, 2003: 2,438
  • Number of Americans wounded (a vague term that includes such horrors as brain damage, limb blasted off, eyes blown out, psyche shattered, etc.) in Bush's war:
    • Official count: 18,777
    • Independent count: up to 48,000
  • Estimated number of Iraqi civilians (men, women, and children) killed in Bush's war since Saddam Hussein was ousted: 38,960
  • [WA: very conservative number. Some human rights group estimate 250,000 total]
  • For Iraqis, the bloodiest month of the war so far: June 2006
    more than 100 civilians killed per day
  • Brig. Gen. Mark Kimmit's advice to Iraqis who see TV reports of innocent civilians being killed by occupying troops: "Change the channel." [WA: intelligent remark?]
  • Percent of Iraqis who want American troops to leave: 82
  • Stockpiles of Weapons of Mass Destruction found in Iraq since Bush committed Americans to war in 2003 on the basis that Saddam had and was about to use WMDs: 0
  • Number of nations in the world: 192
  • Number that joined Bush's "Coalition of the Willing" (COW) to invade Iraq: 48
    (The list includes such military powers as Angola, El Salvador, Eritrea, Estonia, Latvia, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Palau, Romania, Solomon Islands, and Uganda.) [WA: many of the weaker nations were coerced into joining by threats to cut off foreign aid, etc.]
  • Number of COW nations that actually sent any troops to Iraq: 39
    (Of these, 32 sent fewer than 1,000 troops. Many sent no fighting units, deploying only engineers, trainers, humanitarian units, and other noncombat personnel.)

Follow the money:

  • The official White House claim before the invasion of what the war and occupation would cost U.S.taxpayers: $50 billion
  • As of July 2006, the total amount appropriated by Congress for Bush's ongoing war and occupation: $295,634,921,248
  • Current Pentagon spending per month in Iraq: $8 billion (or $185,185.19 per minute)
  • Assuming all troops return home by 2010, the projected "real costs" for the war: More than $1 trillion
    (includes veterans' pay and medical costs, interest on the billions Bush has borrowed to pay for his war, etc.)

Howlin' Paul Wolfowitz

Bonus stat!

  • Annual salary of Stuart Baker, hired by the Bushites to be the White House "Director for Lessons Learned": $106,641
  • Number of lessons that Bush appears to have learned: 0
  • Number of the 39 COW nations contributing troops that have since withdrawn them: 17
    (An additional 7 have announced plans to withdraw all or part of their contingents this year.)
  • Number of COW troops in Iraq: 150,000
  • Number of these that are U.S. troops: 139,000
  • Number of White House officials and cabinet members who have any of their immediate family in Bush's war: 0
Bush's explanation
Matt Wuerker
The imperial presidency

Signing statements

When signing a particular congressional act into law, a few presidents have occasionally issued a "signing statement" to clarify their understanding of what Congress intended. These have not had the force of law and have been used discreetly in the past.

Very quietly, however, Bush has radically increased both the number and reach of these statements, essentially asserting that the president can arbitrarily decide which laws he will obey.

  • Number of signing statements issued by Bush as of July 2006: more than 800
    (This is more than the combined total of all 42 previous presidents.)
  • A few examples of congressionally passed laws he has effectively annulled through these extralegal signing statements:
    • a ban against torture of prisoners by the U.S. military
    • a requirement that the FBI periodically report to Congress on how it is using the Patriot Act to search our homes and secretly seize people's private papers
    • a ban against storage in military databases of intelligence about Americans that was obtained illegally
    • a directive for the executive branch to transmit scientific information to Congress "uncensored and without delay" when requested
  • Provision of the Constitution clearly stating that Congress alone has the power "to make all laws": Article 1, Section 8
  • Provision of the Constitution clearly stating that the president "shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed": Article 2, Section 3
  • Name of the young lawyer in the Reagan administration who wrote a 1986 strategy memo on how to pervert the use of signing statements in order to concentrate more power in the executive branch, as Bush is now doing: Samuel Alito, named to the U.S. Supreme Court by Bush this year

National security letters

These are secret executive writs that the infamous 2001 Patriot Act authorizes the FBI to issue to public libraries, internet firms, banks, and others. Upon receiving an NSL, the institution or firm is required to turn over any private records it holds on you, me, or whomever the agents have chosen to search.

Who authorizes the FBI to issue these secret writs? The FBI itself.

  • Surely the agents have to get a search warrant, a grand jury subpoena, or a court's approval? No
  • But to issue an NSL, an agent must show probable cause that the person being searched has committed some crime, right? No
  • Well, don't officials have to inform citizens that their records are being seized so they can defend themselves or protest? No
  • Number of NSLs issued by various FBI offices last year alone: 9,254

NSA eavesdropping

In 2001, Bush issued a secret order for the National Security Agency to begin vacuuming up massive numbers of telephone and internet exchanges by U.S. citizens, illegally seizing this material without any judicial approval or informing Congress, as required by law.

  • Number of Americans who have had their phone and internet communications taken by NSA: Just about everyone!
    (NSA is tapping into the entire database of long-distance calls and internet messages run through AT&T and probably other companies as well.)
  • In May of this year, the Justice Department abruptly halted an internal investigation that was trying to uncover the name of the top officials who had authorized NSA's warrantless, unconstitutional program. Who killed this probe, which was requested by Congress? George W himself! (He directed NSA simply to refuse security clearances for the department's legal investigators.)

Interesting fact:

The New York Times reported this June that Bush was running another spy program. This one was snooping through international banking records, including millions of bank transactions done by innocent Americans. George reacted angrily to the exposure, branding the Times report "disgraceful" and declaring that revelation of his spy program "does great harm to the United States." The White House and its right-wing acolytes promptly launched a "Hate-the-Times" political campaign.

Name the guy who was the first to reveal that such a bank-spying program was in the works: George W. Bush! At a September 2001 press conference, he announced that he'd just signed an executive order to monitor all international bank transactions.

Watch lists:

From the Bushites' ill-fated Total Information Awareness program (meant to monitor all of our computerized transactions) to the robust efforts by Rumsfeld's Pentagon to barge into the domestic surveillance game, America under Bush has fast become The Watched Society.

  • Number of data-mining programs being run secretly on us by the federal government: Nearly 200 separate programs at 52 agencies
  • Number of "local activity reports" submitted to the Pentagon in 2004 under the "Threat and Local Observation Notice" program (TALON), which directed military officers throughout our country to keep an eye on suspicious activities by civilians: More than 5,000
    (They included such "threats" as peace demonstrators and 10 activists protesting outside Halliburton's headquarters.)
  • Number of official "watch lists" maintained by the feds: More than a dozen run by 9 different agencies
  • Number of Americans on the Transportation Security Administration's "No- Fly" list: That's a secret.
    (TSA concedes that it's in the tens of thousands. In 2005 alone, some 30,000 people called TSA to complain that their names were mistakenly on the list.)
  • Most famous citizen who is on the No-Fly list and has been repeatedly pulled aside by TSA for additional screenings at airports: Sen. Ted Kennedy
  • How can you get your name removed from TSA list? That's a secret.

Name that guy!

In 1966, a young Republican congressman stood against his party's elders to cosponsor the original Freedom of Information Act, valiantly declaring that public records "are public property." He said that FOIA "will make it considerably more difficult for secrecy-minded bureaucrats to decide arbitrarily that the people should be denied access to information on the conduct of government."

Who was that virtuous law maker?

Donald Rumsfeld!

Only eight years later, Gerald Ford's chief of staff strongly urged him to veto the continuation of FOIA. Who was that dastardly staffer?

Donald Rumsfeld!

Who is now one of the chief "secrecy-minded bureaucrats" who routinely violates OIA's principles?

Right, him again!

  • What happened to NSA Director Michael Hayden, who was the key architect of Bush's illegal eavesdropping program and the one who would've formally denied clearances to Justice Department investigators? In May, Bush promoted him to head the CIA.
  • This past May, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales warned that journalists who report on NSA's spy program could be prosecuted under the antiquated Espionage Act of 1917.
  • Times in U.S. history this act has been used to go after the press: 0
  • Margin by which the U.S. House in 1917 voted down an amendment to make the Espionage Act apply to journalists: 184-144
Bush's enemies
Bush in flight suit

Halliburton

Cheney on Halliburton

  • Total value of contracts given to Halliburton for work in the Bush-Cheney "War on Terror" since 2001: More than $15 billion
  • Amount that Halliburton pays to the Third World laborers it imports into Iraq to do the work in its dining facilities, laundries, etc.: $6 per 12-hour day (50 cents an hour)
  • Amount that Halliburton bills us taxpayers for each of these workers: $50 a day
  • Amount that Halliburton bills U.S. taxpayers for:
    • A case of sodas: $45
    • Washing a bag of laundry: $100
  • Halliburton's campaign contributions in Bush-Cheney election years:
    •  In 2000: $285,252 (96% to Republicans)
    •  In 2004: $145,500 (89% to Republicans)
      Plus $365,065 from members of its board of directors (99% to Republicans)
  • Increase in Halliburton's profits since Bush-Cheney took office in 2000: 379%
  • Halliburton's 2005 profit: $1.1 billion
    (highest in the corporation's 86-year history

Cheney on leaving Halliburton

  • Annual payments that Cheney has received from Halliburton since he's been vice-president:
    • 2001: $205,298
    • 2002: $162,392
    • 2003: $178,437
    • 2004: $194,852
    • 2005: $211,465
  • Cash bonus paid to Cheney by Halliburton just before he took office: $1.4 million
  • Retirement package he was given in 2000 after only 5 years as CEO: $20 million
  • Number of times in the past two years that Republicans have killed Sen. Byron Dorgan's amendment to set up a Truman-style committee on war profiteering to investigate Halliburton: 3
  • Naughty word Cheney used during a Senate photo session in 2004 to assail Sen. Patrick Leahy, who had criticized Cheney's ongoing ties to Halliburton: "Go #@!% yourself.

Regime of secrecy

Judge Keith on deomcracy

  • Increase in the number of government documents marked "secret" between 2001 and 2004: 81%
  • Number of government documents stamped "secret" in 2001: 8.6 million
  • Number of government documents stamped "secret" in 2004: 15.6 million (a new record)
  • Cost to taxpayers of classifying and securing documents in 2004: $7.2 billion ($460 per document)
  • Number of previously declassified documents that the CIA tried to reclassify as "secret" under a 2001 secret agreement with the National Archives, even though many had already been published and some date back to the Korean War: 25,315
  • Number of different "official designations" the government now has to classify nonsecret information so it still is kept out of the public's reach: Between 50 and 60
    (They include such stamps as CBU - Controlled But Unclassified, SBU - Sensitive But Unclassified, and LOU—Limited Official Use Only.)
  • The only vice-president in history who has claimed that he, like the president, has the inherent authority to mark "secret" on any document he chooses: "Buckshot" Cheney
  • Number of documents Cheney has classified: That's a secret.
    (He claims he does not have to report this to anyone—not even the president.)
  • Of the 7,045 advisory committee meetings held by the Bushites in 2004, percentage that were completely closed to the public, contrary to the clear intent of the Federal Advisory Committee Act: 64% (a new record)
  • Number of times from 1953 to1975 (the peak of the Cold War) that presidents invoked the "state secrets" privilege, which grants them unilateral power in extraordinary instances literally to shut down court cases on the grounds they could reveal secrets that the president doesn't want disclosed: 4
  • Number of times the same privilege was invoked between 2001 and 2006: At least 24
  • Under Clinton, Attorney General Janet Reno issued an official memo instructing agencies to release as much information as possible to the public. In October 2001, AG John Ashcroft issued a memo canceling Reno's approach, expressly instructing agencies to look for reasons to deny the public access to information and pledging to support the denials if the agencies were sued.
  • 2005 FOIA requests still awaiting a response at year's end: 31%
    (a one-third increase over the 2004 backlog)
  • Median waiting time to get an answer on FOIA request from Bush's justice department: 863 days

Labels:

2 Comments:

  • At Friday, August 25, 2006 12:28:00 AM , Blogger Unknown said...

    You are correct, Joe, that citizens should take responsibility for their own lives TO THE BEST OF THEIR ABILITY amd make such preparations as they can for misfortunes.

    However, it is a FACT that there are those in our society who cannot fend for themselves when misfortune or disaster strikes, and it is incumbent upon public resources to step in and aid the more helpless and vulnerable of our members.

    In the case iof Katrina, for instance, there were literally thousand of the poverty stricken who had no means of transport in order to evacuate and no money to afford public transport. When people live on such a low level of income and their lives are a matter of hand-to-mouth existence, they have no funds with which to lay in survival supplies; it becomes a matter of receiving public aid, or perishing.

    Most middle class Americans cannot imagine the desperate straits of the poorer members of our society.
    Bush's YOYO (you're on your own) policies reflect his lack of knowledge concerning American's poor.

    Thank you for your input and please do visit us again. Let us know when you get your blog up and running and we will visit you. I will check out the url you posted.

     
  • At Friday, August 25, 2006 12:33:00 AM , Blogger Unknown said...

    Joe, either the url is invalid or part of it was omitted. I could not access the site.

     

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home