Mark at Spittle and Ink has an interesting comparison of current law as opposed to a literal interpretation of the Commandments.
It's a door the fundamentalists might think about twice before opening.
Correction:
The link to spittle and ink originally came from one of Jay Lassiter's posts. Sorry Jay.
I like that link. Here is another great one I found on the same subject a while back: http://www.counterbias.com/246.html
ReplyDeleteI was debating people who steadfastly claimed that the constitution was founded on the ten commandments. Such BS! Only about two of those bits of religious dogma could be applied, if any. Argh!
That's an interesting take on the issue.
ReplyDelete