It's not my word, it's from the Washington Post today. Check it out. It isn't the first time the comparison between religious extremists of any stripe has been made. I've done it myself on this blog. The Post probably does it better.
So the fundamentalist Christian and the fundamentalist Muslim agree. Interesting. I wonder if the Muslim reads his Koran. It's obvious to me that the Christian preacher doesn't read his Bible--not the one I read that says that vengeance is the Lord's and warns us not to gloat over our enemies' defeat.
I am not familiar with The Post but "Mr. Ahmadinejad, the president of a country with a lamentable human rights record and a nuclear program, is dangerous, where Mr. Robertson is only pathetic." Good analysis on Robertson.
Saddam was dangerous and was alledged to have weapons of mass destrucion as well. Is this the new propaganda that preludes the sequel in Iran?
So the fundamentalist Christian and the fundamentalist Muslim agree. Interesting. I wonder if the Muslim reads his Koran. It's obvious to me that the Christian preacher doesn't read his Bible--not the one I read that says that vengeance is the Lord's and warns us not to gloat over our enemies' defeat.
ReplyDeleteI am not familiar with The Post but "Mr. Ahmadinejad, the president of a country with a lamentable human rights record and a nuclear program, is dangerous, where Mr. Robertson is only pathetic." Good analysis on Robertson.
ReplyDeleteSaddam was dangerous and was alledged to have weapons of mass destrucion as well. Is this the new propaganda that preludes the sequel in Iran?